Post by Mayur Makwana on Aug 6, 2016 16:08:46 GMT -4
Great topic! The correlation between psychological conditions and economy is definitely overlooked. However, this discussion is missing the very basics of good mental health and instead skipping to the superficial representation of the underlying base, at least for most cases. The long term care and prevention of this expected economical downfall from mental illness lies in very early age of development of human beings. What I meant by this is that we need to incorporate programs focusing on “mental well-being” in schools during child and adolescent age, as most children are unable to obtain such basic learning from home. This, in turn, will form the strong base of steady mindsets, which would lead to productive economic outcome. Treatment for those still affected, in spite of having such training, will be of less burden from an economic point of view. With an effective early age program, I believe the response to treatment will be potent and hence recovery would be faster. In a nutshell, the old saying, “prevention is better than treatment” stands still and should be implemented to prevent such causes.
Post by Mustaf Shariff MS3 on Aug 7, 2016 15:35:24 GMT -4
I think its an interesting and well known correlation the link between mental health and the productivity of an individual at a work place, adding the cost that this relationship has on the economy is even more thought provoking. Though this relationship has always been there the numerical values given to the issue i.e the annual cost of mental illness directly effects businesses and in tern the Gross Domestic Productivity. Though this is an intriguing concept it is one that has been proven in the primary care setting time and time.
The direction of healthcare has been heading towards preventative care for quite sometime now, I believe this is in the same realm. We have said preventing disease by screening guidelines prevents higher cost of care as well as better patient out, the article suggests the same about mental heath and the cost of untreated and diagnosed on the global economy. Furthermore, the concept of mental toll on productivity is a fascinating one, and makes the connection a concrete one when giving it a numerical value.
Post by Anirudh Lingamaneni on Aug 7, 2016 22:21:32 GMT -4
I definitely agree with the article that a person mental health directly influence the economy. Because this is true, many companies try to promote a more healthier and peaceful environment in order to establish a better work force. Many fortune 500 companies, have lounge and casual work area in order to relax the mind and create a more peaceful environment. Over the years, you may have notice that many companies start to deviate from the tradition work environment with cubicles and dull environment to these new modern casual work area. The main reason these kinda area comes up is because they help people relieve stress and anxiety. A person is who is less anxious and more healthy mentally is more inclined to work harder and better which in turn is better return for the company. The reason that companies are coming up with creative idea to help mental health is reason enough to show that there is a clear link between mental health and the economy.
Post by Huaihui (Extern) on Aug 8, 2016 14:17:06 GMT -4
It is really true that we need to pay more attention to the definitive link between mental health and economic productivity. The WHO estimates that 7.4 percent of global DALYs (disability-adjusted life years) are caused by disorders in the mental and behavioral disorders category, and major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder are the top 2(http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/global/global-dalys-contributed-by-mental-and-behavioral-disorders.shtml). The disease category of PACT Atlanta's patients consistent with this data. Some patients are still working, so they need to take a leave for clinic visit. Therefore our jobs are very important not only for patients themselves but also for the society's flourishing.
Post by Bimel Thomas (MS3) on Aug 9, 2016 18:12:39 GMT -4
I don’t think this article really unearths some kind of groundbreaking finding (healthy people are more productive? Whaaaaat) but it does briefly illustrate certain aspects of the mental health component of general health that are often overlooked. Great companies take care of their employees, which results in a mentally healthy workforce and a productive, profitable establishment. I would go further and say that these people probably live happier lives outside of the workplace (family life, socially, etc.) because the work environment seems to be a common source of stress that permeates to and exacerbates other stressors in one’s life. In my opinion, any opportunity to care for a person’s well-being should be welcomed and prioritized very highly, regardless of any economic benefit that may result. I also think new mental health programs would work wonders for our current unemployment rate, specifically targeting depressed/anxious patients caught in the vicious cycle of the inability to land a job.
The author’s examples of mental health-boosting initiatives in Zambia and Pakistan are encouraging, though not well expounded upon. The fact that every dollar invested into mental disorders results in a $4 boost to the economy overall should be reason enough for employers to explore avenues to prevent/treat issues suffered by their employees, and I look forward to new and creative ways American companies choose to implement plans for this in the hopefully not-too-distant future.
Post by Vandan Upadhyaya on Aug 10, 2016 16:47:39 GMT -4
It is great to see a larger spotlight being placed on mental health by WHO reports and the community world wide. But this isn't a new finding, but rather a new interpretation of something many in the healthcare industry already expect. Putting down an exact numerical value to exactly how much mental health affects global economies may change peoples minds about the exact extent to which mental health is an issue. This may encourage economies around the world to take action towards addressing mental health at least in hopes of booming the current state of their economies. The private sector has already started to address some of these issues. The work environment experience over the past decades has evolved in order stress the exact issue of mental health in the work place. Large companies like Google, Microsoft, and more have competed against one another to see who can provide a more healthier and efficient work place environment. They have seen data that shows how much an greater efficiency is achieved when one's employees are healthy mentally and physically and enjoy the work that they do. I believe soon such an understanding of mental health will become more wide spread into daily life and be incorporated into policies of governments to address the issue.
Much of the economic cost of mental illness stems from workers’ reduced productivity. We analyze the links between mental health and two alternative workplace productivity measures – absenteeism and presenteeism (i.e., lower productivity while attending work) – explicitly allowing these relationships to be moderated by the nature of the job itself. We find that absence rates are approximately five percent higher among workers who report being in poor mental health. Moreover, job conditions are related to both presenteeism and absenteeism even after accounting for workers’ self-reported mental health status. Job conditions are relatively more important in understanding diminished productivity at work if workers are in good rather than poor mental health. The effects of job complexity and stress on absenteeism do not depend on workers’ mental health, while job security and control moderate the effect of mental illness on absence days.
It is encouraging to learn that mental issues have now become so outspoken and addressed in society, that is spreading to target people in third world countries that are often afflicted with both mental health issues and poverty. Of course the combination is a vicious circle that can escalate the feeling of helplessness they encounter due to their circumstances. Just by providing women with contraception and performing CBT in Pakistan, there are examples of improvement and efforts made to making it a little less harder to deal with poverty and joblessness. The mind and body are definitely interconnected and in places like America where levels of depression and anxiety are rising higher than ever and the emphasis of effective and productive job performance, it is only understandable that in the long run there will be more loss than gain economically. In any case, treating mental health problems does contribute to overall productivity and therefore should be something that must be emphasized and further addressed, regardless of economical status.
Post by Asra Rab, MS4 on Aug 12, 2016 10:56:08 GMT -4
I found this article to be something that I think most people know but don’t really think about. Until recently, many companies did not realize the great benefits of having a healthy corporate culture. Like another student mentioned, Google has become the best example of this. I also really like the point Nora Ashraf made about the myth of depression being a “first-world problem.” While the most common causes of depression and anxiety may vary between developed and developing countries, it is undeniable that stress can contribute to or worsen preexisting mental health illnesses. It was also interesting to see learn about the Pakistani company that uses CBT because there can be a cultural stigma against mental health disorders in Asian countries.
Post by Charles Seaton on Aug 12, 2016 15:49:04 GMT -4
This article was a very interesting read. I think the premise of the article is pretty intuitive but now it appears that the link between mental health and the economy is being investigated in a more real way. Whether the motivation for research into the relationship was motivated by economic factors, or out of concern for the mental health and wellbeing of the people will not matter as everyone will benefit from an improved economy. While the effects noticed (referencing the provision of OCPs in Zambia)may seem, at first, like an overstatement of the impact interventions like these may have on the individual, I think it is important to note that the cumulative effect of small and personal interventions may have large effects on macro scales.
Post by Paul Lee UMHS MS4 on Aug 14, 2016 12:57:34 GMT -4
The link between positive mental health and increased productivity is not surprising. A healthy mind and a sense of purpose in the work place are the engines that drive mental and physical energy which can translate into productivity. Many successful companies around the world, especially companies that rely on creativity from their employees, foster a nurturing and "fun" work place enviornment to promote happiness and thus positive mental energies.
Most of the outcomes presented in the article seem obvious to me, but I did find the link between long term birth control for women in Africa to increased productivity very interesting. The fact that birth control gives women more control over their lives has been well known, but in more impoverished contries where women may unfortunately have less civil liberties than the U.S., this sense of control is magnified. Having a domino effect, women in these countires feel empowered by having control of their lives, which leads to a more positive mental outlook, and thus and increase in productivity in the work place.
Post by Katarzyna Goryl on Aug 25, 2016 10:40:18 GMT -4
The article is totally on key. Mental health has a huge impact on economics. If a person is happy and problem free, his or her job quality will be much more productive than to those employees with psychiatric disabilities. Although these employees do exist I am not saying they shouldn't be working because their output is lacking. It just means that they should be treated. The article speaks of treatments in other countries on various psychologically ill patients, who undergo simple treatments such as migraine medications which in turn had shown significant improvement in economic output. The improvements with treatments will eventually decrease the prevalence of the disorders thus creating a better quality of life for people. With that in mind happy people are great employees which in turn makes the world go round much more smoothly. Economics is greatly dependent on a Healthy person both mind and body. KG
According to WHO, ground breaking study has established a link between mental health and economic productivity. In retrospect, this should not be "ground breaking news". It is quite apparent that where you work/how you gain income, can greatly influence your socio-ecconomic position and by extension mental health. A stressful environment can greatly contribute to mental health.Socioeconomic status is one of the most powerful risk factors for poor health outcomes. Persons of lower socioeconomic status suffer disproportionately from nearly all diseases and have higher rates of mortality than people of higher socioeconomic status. According to a study that examined a database of 34,000 patients with two or more psychiatric hospitalizations in Massachusetts during 1994-2000, unemployment, poverty and housing unaffordability were correlated with a risk of mental illness. This finding is reported on in the current issue of the American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, published by the American Psychological Association (APA). "The poorer one's socioeconomic conditions are, the higher one's risk is for mental disability and psychiatric hospitalization," said author Christopher G. Hudson, Ph.D., of Salem State College. This was found regardless of what economic hardship or type of mental illness the person suffered.